Menu
Tue, 16 July 2024

Newsletter sign-up

Subscribe now
The House Live All
We need a heart disease action plan to end heartbreak for good Partner content
By British Heart Foundation
Health
“The Forgotten Majority”: Leading Charities Call for Action to Tackle Long-Term Conditions Partner content
Health
BCG Britannia Stakes charity race at Royal Ascot is a win-win for good causes Partner content
Culture
The next UK government must ensure health, safety and wellbeing standards are upheld Partner content
Health
Parliament Unwrapped: What did the 2019-2024 Parliament mean for workers’ health, safety, and wellbeing? Partner content
Health
Press releases

Government U-turns on moves to hold tech giants legally responsible for content

3 min read

Matt Hancock has signalled a government climbdown after he insisted ministers have no plans to make internet giants legally responsible for content posted on their platforms.


The Health Secretary said the likes of Facebook and Google would “collapse” if they were to be treated in the same way as other publishers.

Bur earlier this week, suicide prevention minister Jackie Doyle-Price said she backed the introduction of legislation which would see the firms held criminally liable for the content they publish.

Ms Doyle-Price had said “nothing was off the table” ahead of the publication of a white paper setting out the Government’s plans to crack down on harmful content posted online.

In an interview with the BBC, she said: “We could make them responsible for their content by classing them as publishers…I do view them as publishers and I would like the law to hold them to account on that basis.”

Her comments came after the death of 14-year-old Molly Russell, who committed suicide after viewing images related to self-harm, depression and suicide on image-sharing sites Instagram and Pinterest.

But speaking to the BBC’s Today programme, Mr Hancock rowed back on the suggestion, saying it would make it impossible for social media companies to surivive.

He said: “The whole concept would collapse if you made them legally liable for everything on their site. For instance, I wouldn’t be able to send out a tweet because they would be legally responsible for it. So, you need something new and in-between.

“That is where this concept of a duty of care comes from. You can’t deliver a lot of this against the social media companies because the nature of the technology. They have the algorithms, but what you can do is require them to act in a socially responsible way. My sense is they now want to do that, but they need help and support.”

Instagram boss Adam Mosseri said yesterday that he accepted Instagram was “not where we need to be on the issues of self-harm and suicide”, as he threw his weight behind plans for a new statutory duty of care.

The social media chief said: “That idea sounds very much in line with the responsibility to keep people safe. What that looks like is a decision for policy makers to make.”

A spokesperson for the Prime Minister said: “Matt Hancock has set out the position. We’ve had constructive discussions this week and what we have seen is a willingness to solve the problem. We’re setting out our own White Paper shortly in internet safety and there will be more detail there as to what we would like to introduce to make this even safer.”

PoliticsHome Newsletters

PoliticsHome provides the most comprehensive coverage of UK politics anywhere on the web, offering high quality original reporting and analysis: Subscribe

Read the most recent article written by John Johnston - MP Warns That Online Hate Could Lead To More Real World Attacks On Parliamentarians

Categories

Health Culture