Menu
Sat, 23 November 2024

Newsletter sign-up

Subscribe now
The House Live All
Collaboration is key for a smooth transition to Great British Rail Partner content
By Transport UK
Transport
Why addressing gender equality is key to meeting our net-zero ambitions Partner content
By WSP
Port of Dover party conference season unites politicians on plan for economic growth Partner content
Transport
Recruiting the next generation of train drivers Partner content
By Rail Safety and Standards Board (RSSB)
Transport
Why UK airspace needs to be part of Labour’s infrastructure revolution Partner content
By NATS
Transport
Press releases
By Luton Rising
By Luton Rising

HS2 costs could soar by another 20% to £106bn, warns official review

2 min read

The cost of HS2 could soar to £106bn, according to a government-comissioned review into the project.


The unpublished report, seen by the Financial Times, warns there is "considerable risk" the rail project could see its costs rise a further 20% beyond the estimated £81-88bn figure set out last year.

Initially, the high-speed rail project was meant to cost around £56bn, until an internal "stock take" review by chairman Allan Cook in September found spiralling costs would lead to a £30bn overspend.

But the latest government-ordered report, led by former HS2 chairman Doug Oakervee, found the total spend on the project could hit £106bn and see years of delays beyond the original deadline.

Mr Oakervee said "on balance" the Government should continue with the first phase of the project, which will link London's Euston Station and Birmingham, but called for a six-month pause on the second phase from the West Midlands to Manchester and Leeds to review whether other rail services could complete the route instead.

His review also warned that "significant progress" was needed to ensure the first phase of construction of the line to Birmingham, set to begin in the spring, would go ahead on time.

And he warned "further work" was needed to examine the potential for regional growth from the project, saying it was "hard" to estimate the potential economic benefits would come from its completion.

He wrote: "The review has not seen convincing evidence that HS2 Ltd, especially the phase one construction team, have the level of control and management of the construction normally associated with major projects."

The lukewarm report comes amid growing anger among some new Tory MPs over the project, with a group of around 15 MPs set to meet Boris Johnson in the coming days to set out their concerns.

Mr Johnson is expected to make a decision soon on the future of the project after he slammed the "spiralling costs" during his leadership campaign.

But the Prime Minister, who vowed during the election campaign to fix UK's "lopsided" economy, has raised concerns about scrapping the project, saying: "I worry about cancelling a big national project of that scale without anything else to replace it."

Responding to the report, a spokesperson for the Department for Transport, said: "A draft of the Oakervee Report was deliver shortly before Christmas. The Transport Secretary, Chancellor and Prime Minister will take a final decision on HS2 shortly."

PoliticsHome Newsletters

PoliticsHome provides the most comprehensive coverage of UK politics anywhere on the web, offering high quality original reporting and analysis: Subscribe

Read the most recent article written by John Johnston - MP Warns That Online Hate Could Lead To More Real World Attacks On Parliamentarians

Categories

Transport
Podcast
Engineering a Better World

The Engineering a Better World podcast series from The House magazine and the IET is back for series two! New host Jonn Elledge discusses with parliamentarians and industry experts how technology and engineering can provide policy solutions to our changing world.

NEW SERIES - Listen now