Menu
Wed, 5 February 2025

Newsletter sign-up

Subscribe now
The House Live All
Making performance-led home retrofit a reality Partner content
Energy
Britain on the brink of a nuclear renaissance Partner content
Energy
Small Modular Reactors: Powering the UK's Clean Energy Revolution Partner content
By WSP
Energy
Shaping UK energy in 2025 with innovation, investment and skills for net-zero Partner content
Energy
On Hydrogen: New Report Provides Roadmap to a Low Carbon Future Partner content
Energy
Press releases

John McDonnell argues dividends should have gone to public

2 min read

John McDonnell will argue today that more than £37bn that has been paid to shareholders of privatised rail, telecoms, energy and water companies could and should have been invested in public services.


The £37bn figure comes from new Labour research. The party made nationalisation a major plank of its manifesto at the 2017 election, promising to bring “key utilities back into public ownership to deliver lower prices, more accountability and a more sustainable economy”. 

Speaking in Lincoln later today, the Shadow Chancellor will say: “These figures show what could have gone into investment in these public services in order to expand and improve them or keep their charges down.

“Families suffer from stagnant wages not being able to keep up with prices of items like energy bills, and underfunded public services, yet billions has gone into the hands of shareholders,” he will say.

“The next Labour government will call an end to the privatisation of our public sector, and we will look to bring back in to public ownership many of the vital services sold off by the Tories, which are undermining the living standards of millions of working households.”

The Institute for Fiscal Studies’ deputy director Carl Emmerson said profit alone was not the key argument for renationalising privatised companies: “The argument being made here could be made about any profitable company – that dividends could go the Treasury rather than to shareholders.

“However, we don’t tend to think that the government is best placed issuing lots of debt buying up companies just because they are profitable, because the private sector is often better at managing things like risk than government. Otherwise the government could just buy Apple. The argument for nationalisation is usually a different one than the one being made here. It’s about how who can manage it best.”

 

PoliticsHome Newsletters

PoliticsHome provides the most comprehensive coverage of UK politics anywhere on the web, offering high quality original reporting and analysis: Subscribe

Read the most recent article written by Richard Welbirg - Theresa May acquires Article 50 portrait

Categories

Energy