Menu
Wed, 17 July 2024

Newsletter sign-up

Subscribe now
The House Live All
Plug in to unlock: the benefits of smart meter-enabled EV flexibility Partner content
By Cornwall Insight
Environment
The role of renewable liquid gases in the fight to reach net-zero Partner content
By Dimeta
Environment
The future needs innovators Partner content
By Urban Splash
Environment
How clean energy will help deliver UK economic growth Partner content
By SSE
Communities
Harnessing the untapped potential of biomethane Partner content
By SGN
Environment
Press releases

John McDonnell argues dividends should have gone to public

2 min read

John McDonnell will argue today that more than £37bn that has been paid to shareholders of privatised rail, telecoms, energy and water companies could and should have been invested in public services.


The £37bn figure comes from new Labour research. The party made nationalisation a major plank of its manifesto at the 2017 election, promising to bring “key utilities back into public ownership to deliver lower prices, more accountability and a more sustainable economy”. 

Speaking in Lincoln later today, the Shadow Chancellor will say: “These figures show what could have gone into investment in these public services in order to expand and improve them or keep their charges down.

“Families suffer from stagnant wages not being able to keep up with prices of items like energy bills, and underfunded public services, yet billions has gone into the hands of shareholders,” he will say.

“The next Labour government will call an end to the privatisation of our public sector, and we will look to bring back in to public ownership many of the vital services sold off by the Tories, which are undermining the living standards of millions of working households.”

The Institute for Fiscal Studies’ deputy director Carl Emmerson said profit alone was not the key argument for renationalising privatised companies: “The argument being made here could be made about any profitable company – that dividends could go the Treasury rather than to shareholders.

“However, we don’t tend to think that the government is best placed issuing lots of debt buying up companies just because they are profitable, because the private sector is often better at managing things like risk than government. Otherwise the government could just buy Apple. The argument for nationalisation is usually a different one than the one being made here. It’s about how who can manage it best.”

 

PoliticsHome Newsletters

PoliticsHome provides the most comprehensive coverage of UK politics anywhere on the web, offering high quality original reporting and analysis: Subscribe

Read the most recent article written by Richard Welbirg - Theresa May acquires Article 50 portrait

Categories

Energy
Podcast
Engineering a Better World

The Engineering a Better World podcast series from The House magazine and the IET is back for series two! New host Jonn Elledge discusses with parliamentarians and industry experts how technology and engineering can provide policy solutions to our changing world.

NEW SERIES - Listen now