Menu
Tue, 26 November 2024

Newsletter sign-up

Subscribe now
The House Live All
By Mark White, HW Brands, Iwan Morgan and Anthony Eames
Environment
Communities
Press releases

Michael Gove Claims He "Never Heard" Johnson Make "Bodies" Remark

Boris Johnson is accused of personally briefing a number of newspaper editors that Dominic Cummings was the source of a number of Downing Street leaks (Alamy)

3 min read

Michael Gove has failed to deny Boris Johnson said he would rather "let the bodies pile high in their thousands" than introduce a third coronavirus lockdown.

Gove, the chancellor of the duchy of Lancaster, on Monday told MPs he was in the October meeting where the Prime Minister allegedly made the comment and "never heard that kind of language".

He added "the idea that he would any such thing I find incredible," but did not categorically deny the claim, reported by the Daily Mail this morning, and supported by sources referenced by the BBC and ITV.

Johnson denied the story earlier today while on a visit to Wrexham, north Wales.

Asked whether he made the remark, he said: "No, but I think the important thing I think people want us to get on and do as a Government is to make sure that the lockdowns work.

"They have, and I really pay tribute to the people of this country, this whole country of ours, really pulled together and, working with the vaccination programme, we have got the disease under control".

He went on to describe the allegation “total, total rubbish".

His official spokesman also said it was “untrue”, and denied claims from ITV’s Robert Peston that Johnson “shouted it in his study” and it was heard by “a number of people”.

"We are denying it, that the Prime Minister said that,” he added. ”He has made that clear that he did not say it."

Reports of the comments have attracted anger from the Covid-19 Justice for Bereaved Families Campaign, who called them “callous” and will have “caused untold hurt to hundreds of thousands of us across the whole of the country”.

In a statement they added: “These ‘bodies’ were our loved ones. Mothers and fathers, daughters and sons, brothers and sisters, grandparents, husbands and wives.

The Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer said he was “astonished to see those words”, and had earlier called on the PM to make a public statement about them.

"If he did say those things then he's got to explain it, if he didn't, go on the record and publicly explain what was said and what wasn't said,” he added.

"I think everybody will be deeply concerned, not least those all families that have lost someone during this pandemic."Johnson's spokesperson failed to deny, however, that it was the Prime Minister himself who briefed three national newspapers Dominic Cummings was the source of a number of damaging leaks.

Speaking to reporters they simply said he was “not going to be drawn on the inquiry” into finding out who within Downing Street is behind a raft of recent stories.

Pressed several times to explicitly say the PM had not phoned the editors of The Times, The Sun and The Telegraph ahead of front-page articles blaming his former chief aide the spokesman would not do so.

He said: “I've seen there's a great deal of speculation over the weekend that's related to this, to the leaks, and I'm not planning to be drawn on it.”

The stories on Friday morning accused Cummings of being the so-called “chatty rat” who revealed details of the second lockdown last autumn, as well as recent stories about who paid for the renovations of the PM’s flat above Number 11 Downing Street.

It provoked a furious response from the ex-advisor, who in a 1,000 word blog said Johnson had interfered with the inquiry into the lockdown leak, and suggested a close ally of his fiancee Carrie Symonds was the real culprit.

No.10 say the inquiry is ongoing, and sources briefed this morning that Cummings has not been exonerated by Cabinet Secretary Simon Case as he claimed he was told.

PoliticsHome Newsletters

PoliticsHome provides the most comprehensive coverage of UK politics anywhere on the web, offering high quality original reporting and analysis: Subscribe

Categories

Political parties