Menu
Sat, 23 November 2024

Newsletter sign-up

Subscribe now
The House Live All
A highly skilled workforce that delivers economic growth and regional prosperity demands a local approach Partner content
By Instep UK
Economy
UK Advertising: The Creative Powerhouse Fuelling Global Growth Partner content
Economy
Trusted to deliver Britain’s green growth Partner content
By Trust Ports Partnership
Economy
Taking the next steps for working carers – the need for paid Carer’s Leave Partner content
By TSB
Health
“Quo vadis” for the foundational industries in the UK Partner content
By BASF
Economy
Press releases

Supreme Court chief: Ministers must 'spell out' post-Brexit legal plan

Emilio Casalicchio

2 min read

Britain’s top judge has demanded clarity from ministers about how the UK judiciary should handle European court decisions after Brexit.


Supreme Court president Lord Neuberger said judges should not face the blame for misinterpretations “when parliament has failed to do so”.

The issue hinges on how judges are to interpret case law from the European Court of Justice (ECJ) once its jurisdiction over Britain ends.

It comes as a separate report says the Supreme Court will be able to block EU requests to hand over criminal suspects after Brexit.

Theresa May has promised that the ECJ will have no power over the UK once Britain quits the European Union.

But UK courts will still have to use European case law to inform their decisions long after Brexit.

Lord Neuberger, who steps down from his role next month, told the BBC that parliament must “spell out” how judges should approach the issue.

"If [the Government] doesn't express clearly what the judges should do about decisions of the ECJ after Brexit, or indeed any other topic after Brexit, then the judges will simply have to do their best," he said.

"But to blame the judges for making the law when parliament has failed to do so would be unfair.”

He added: "If the UK parliament says we should take into account decisions of the ECJ then we will do so.

"If it says we shouldn't then we won't. Basically we will do what the statute says."

A government spokesperson said: "We have been clear that as we leave the EU, the direct jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in the UK must come to an end.

"However, we want to provide maximum certainty so the Repeal Bill will ensure that for future cases, UK courts continue to interpret EU-derived law using the ECJ's case law, as it exists on the day we leave the EU."

'EXTRADITION POWER'

Elsewhere, Brexit Secretary David Davis has said British citizens facing extradition to EU states will be unable to appeal to the ECJ after Brexit, according to the Daily Telegraph.

The paper says the move is a bid to satisfy Brexit-backing Tory MPs who want the Supreme Court to be the highest judgement body on all issues.

But Guy Verhofstadt, the European Parliament's chief Brexit negotiator, told the Telegraph the ECJ should continue to oversee EU extradition requests to maintain the “legal order” of the bloc.

PoliticsHome Newsletters

PoliticsHome provides the most comprehensive coverage of UK politics anywhere on the web, offering high quality original reporting and analysis: Subscribe

Categories

Brexit Economy
Podcast
Engineering a Better World

The Engineering a Better World podcast series from The House magazine and the IET is back for series two! New host Jonn Elledge discusses with parliamentarians and industry experts how technology and engineering can provide policy solutions to our changing world.

NEW SERIES - Listen now