Menu
Fri, 22 November 2024

Newsletter sign-up

Subscribe now
The House Live All
Big tech backing nuclear is huge opportunity for Britain Partner content
Time is running out for a treaty to end plastic pollution – here’s why it matters Partner content
Accelerating a sustainable and resilient energy transition Partner content
By WSP
Environment
Environment
Home affairs
Press releases

A modern legal framework for protecting and managing wildlife

Law Commission | Law Commission

3 min read Partner content

In a report published on Tuesday 10 November the Law Commission recommends reforms to modernise and simplify the law regulating wildlife and create a flexible legal framework for the future.

The current law regulating wildlife is spread over a collection of Acts dating back to 1831. The original purpose of much of the law was to govern activities such as hunting and fishing, including poaching. Over the years it has expanded to conserve species, ensure the welfare of wildlife and protect local biodiversity. Much of the older legislation is out of step with modern requirements, and there is duplication between the principal modern Act – the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 – and Regulations made with a view to implementing EU law obligations. The result is a legal landscape that is out of date, confused and sometimes contradictory.

In its report, the Commission is recommending that the patchwork of existing legislation be replaced by a single statute. The new statute brings together the law governing the protection, control and management of wildlife to make it more consistent, easier to understand and simpler to use. Reflecting relevant EU directives and international conventions as well as national wildlife policy, the statute provides a regulatory framework organised around schedules listing protected and controlled species and prohibited conduct.

Existing protections for wild animals, birds and plants are maintained but a statutory procedure for amending the schedules is introduced, allowing for more strategic management of species. The existing requirement for protected species lists to be reviewed every five years is extended to include all relevant lists. Ministers retain the power to make changes between reviews but they will be required to publish their reasons if they do not follow expert advice.

The Commission’s recommended reforms reduce the current dependency on criminal law by allowing an appropriate mix of regulatory measures such as guidance, advice and a varied and flexible system of civil sanctions. But the penalty for the most serious wildlife crimes will be extended from six months to two years in prison.

Nicholas Paines QC, Law Commissioner for public law, said: “Our reforms sweep away the confused and contradictory patchwork of existing legislation to provide a balance between the needs of the people who manage wildlife and those who want to protect it.

“We are recommending a modern, flexible regulatory framework that will allow for the strategic, long-term management of wild animals, birds and plants and their habitats. What we are recommending does not alter the levels of protection currently offered to wildlife but it will help people understand what their obligations and duties are in respect of wildlife, what they can and cannot do, and what to expect should they break the rules.”

A draft of the new statute, the Wildlife Bill, is included in the Commission’s report.

Read the most recent article written by Law Commission - The best of both worlds: How to strengthen hate crime laws and protect free speech