Menu
Sat, 23 November 2024

Newsletter sign-up

Subscribe now
The House Live All
A highly skilled workforce that delivers economic growth and regional prosperity demands a local approach Partner content
By Instep UK
Economy
UK Advertising: The Creative Powerhouse Fuelling Global Growth Partner content
Economy
Trusted to deliver Britain’s green growth Partner content
By Trust Ports Partnership
Economy
Home affairs
Taking the next steps for working carers – the need for paid Carer’s Leave Partner content
By TSB
Health
Press releases

Hammer blow for Theresa May as Government found to be in contempt of Parliament over Brexit legal advice row

3 min read

Ministers were in contempt of Parliament when they refused to reveal the full Brexit legal advice they have received, MPs have ruled.


In a huge blow for Theresa May, the Commons voted 311 to 293 to sanction the Government.

It is thought to be the first time that a government has found to be in contempt of Parliament.

A government amendment which would have referred the matter to the Privileges Committee had earlier been rejected by 311 votes to 307.

Within minutes of the result being announced, Commons leader Andrea Leadsom said the Government had "listened carefully and we will publish the final and full advice" tomorrow.

Parliament passed a motion last month calling on ministers to reveal all of the legal advice on the Prime Minister's Brexit deal given to Cabinet by attorney general Geoffrey Cox.

But instead, Mr Cox yeserday produced a 52-page “reasoned position statement” on the contents of the withdrawal agreement, which will be voted on by Parliament next week.

A letter was then sent to Mr Bercow by Labour, the SNP, the Lib Dems, Greens, Plaid Cymru and the DUP - who Theresa May relies on to prop up her government - accusing ministers of being in contempt of Parliament.

Opening today's debate, Shadow Brexit Secretary Keir Starmer accused the Government of “wilfully refusing to comply with a binding order of this House”.

“Yesterday the Government published a reasoned position paper,” he said. “That was not legal advice, it simply described the deal, it was a synopsis.

“It was in the nature of an explainer, an explainer having already been published when the deal was published, was a long way from legal advice.

“The attorney made a statement to the House and then he answered questions, but the Government did not publish the full and final advice by the attorney general to the Cabinet. That is the long and short of it.

“The Government is wilfully refusing to comply with a binding order of this House and that is contempt.”

Responding on behalf of the Government, Leader of the House, Andrea Leadsom, said: “Anyone present in the chamber for the attorney general’s statement and his subsequent responses to questions can be in absolutely no doubt that the attorney general gave a full and frank exposition of the legal position of the withdrawal agreement.

“I simply reject any suggestion that the attorney general has done anything other than treat this house with anything other than the greatest of respect."

Tonight's defeat comes just hours before Mrs May kicks off five days of debate on her Brexit deal.

She is also facing the prospect of another defeat this evening over calls for Parliament to be able to amend any motion the Government brings to the Commons if the deal is voted down next week.

PoliticsHome Newsletters

PoliticsHome provides the most comprehensive coverage of UK politics anywhere on the web, offering high quality original reporting and analysis: Subscribe

Read the most recent article written by Nicholas Mairs - Public sector workers to get 5% pay rise from April if Labour wins election

Podcast
Engineering a Better World

The Engineering a Better World podcast series from The House magazine and the IET is back for series two! New host Jonn Elledge discusses with parliamentarians and industry experts how technology and engineering can provide policy solutions to our changing world.

NEW SERIES - Listen now