Menu
Sun, 24 November 2024

Newsletter sign-up

Subscribe now
The House Live All
A highly skilled workforce that delivers economic growth and regional prosperity demands a local approach Partner content
By Instep UK
Economy
UK Advertising: The Creative Powerhouse Fuelling Global Growth Partner content
Economy
Trusted to deliver Britain’s green growth Partner content
By Trust Ports Partnership
Economy
Taking the next steps for working carers – the need for paid Carer’s Leave Partner content
By TSB
Health
“Quo vadis” for the foundational industries in the UK Partner content
By BASF
Economy
Press releases

Steve Baker: Government will not publish Brexit impact reports for three weeks

Agnes Chambre

2 min read

The Government will not publish papers detailing the impact of Brexit on the economy for another three weeks, a Brexit minister has said. 


Steve Baker told MPs today it would take “some time” to bring together the evidence from a string of assessments into how quitting the EU will affect British businesses and jobs.

The delay comes after John Bercow said yesterday that the documents should be given to the Brexit Select Committee by this evening.

In a unanimous Commons vote last Wednesday, MPs ordered the Government to deliver the assessments to the committee, who could then decide what information should be made public.

The Brexit Minister said today the documents will be passed to the committee “as soon as possible”, but the Government expects this to be three weeks. 

He said: "We will provide this information to the committee as soon as is possible. We have made clear to the House authorities that we currently expect this to be no more than three weeks."

He also stated the reports were not “a series of impact assessments examining the quantitative impact of Brexit on these sectors”.

'WIDE MIX OF ANALYSIS'

The comments follow David Davis saying yesterday the 58 individual impact assessments did not “exist” in the form understood by the opposition.

“It is a wide mix of qualitative and quantitative analysis contained in a range of documents developed at different times since the referendum. It means looking at 58 sectors to help inform our negotiating positions,” Mr Baker said today. 

Elsewhere he hit out at Labour for urging the Government to publish the reports, implying the party would be viewed as unpatriotic.

“I think the public will look at the Labour party today, will look at what they’re asking and will look at the narrative that members opposite create and they will ask, whose side are they on?”

Shadow Brexit minister Matthew Pennycook hit back at the news the reports will not be published immediately.

“This farce has dragged on far too long, ministers cannot use semantics and doublespeak to avoid the clear instruction that this House has given. There can be no further delay, ministers just need to get on with it,” he said. 

'GROSS CONTEMPT'

Tory MP Anna Soubry also attacked the Government, claiming the failure to publish was a “gross contempt” of Parliament. 

"Would the minister please take this matter seriously? This is a gross contempt of this place," she said. 

"The Government was specifically asked if it wasn't going to vote against the motion, then what was its problem. Disclose this material, and disclose it properly and quickly."

 

PoliticsHome Newsletters

PoliticsHome provides the most comprehensive coverage of UK politics anywhere on the web, offering high quality original reporting and analysis: Subscribe

Read the most recent article written by Agnes Chambre - Confusion among Labour's top team as senior figures disagree over second EU referendum

Categories

Brexit Economy
Podcast
Engineering a Better World

The Engineering a Better World podcast series from The House magazine and the IET is back for series two! New host Jonn Elledge discusses with parliamentarians and industry experts how technology and engineering can provide policy solutions to our changing world.

NEW SERIES - Listen now