Menu
Sat, 23 November 2024

Newsletter sign-up

Subscribe now
The House Live All
A highly skilled workforce that delivers economic growth and regional prosperity demands a local approach Partner content
By Instep UK
Economy
UK Advertising: The Creative Powerhouse Fuelling Global Growth Partner content
Economy
Trusted to deliver Britain’s green growth Partner content
By Trust Ports Partnership
Economy
Taking the next steps for working carers – the need for paid Carer’s Leave Partner content
By TSB
Health
“Quo vadis” for the foundational industries in the UK Partner content
By BASF
Economy
Press releases

Treasury And Downing Street At War Over Who Is To Blame For Failing To Tackle Pandemic Fraud

Rishi Sunak rejected claims he was "ignoring" the situation around financial fraud related to the Covid schemes for businesses (Alamy)

4 min read

Rishi Sunak mounted a fightback in the row over who is to blame for billions in taxpayer cash being wasted after fraudulent claims by businesses during the pandemic.

The Chancellor rejected suggestions he was “ignoring” the situation after Boris Johnson denied he had agreed with a Treasury decision amid reports £4.3billion of Covid loans were being written off, a figure now being disputed by the government.

Meanwhile an ally of Sunak used an Urgent Question in the Commons today to raise why a key piece of legislation which would help retrieve money obtained through fraud has been ditched, in an apparent attempt to shift culpability.

Tory MP Kevin Hollinrake asked about claims from Lord Agnew that the Economic Crime Bill would not be brought forward in this Parliamentary session.

Agnew had cited this as one of the reasons for his decision to quit as a Treasury minister earlier this week, accusing the government of "schoolboy" handling of fraudulent Covid business loans.

In his letter to the Prime Minister after he dramatically resigned at the despatch box in the upper chamber he wrote: “Last week a foolish decision was made to the kill off the prospect of an economic crime bill in the third session.

“This would have enhanced our ability to tackle fraud with further savings of taxpayers money."

In the Commons today, Hollinrake put further pressure on the government to tackle the issue. "Economic crime costs the people of this country £100billion per annum, according to the National Crime Agency," he said. 

"The government has repeatedly committed to legislate to give our agencies the tools they need to tackle this problem.

"It was very concerning to hear from Lord Agnew, who recently resigned from his role as minister responsible for countering fraud, that a decision has been made to drop the Economic Crime Bill from the legislation due in the next parliamentary session."

In response the business minister Paul Scully would not confirm whether the government was scrapping plans for the new law.

"I am sure he understands I am not going to speculate on the content of any future Queen's Speech”, he replied to Hollinrake.

But he added: "However, I can confirm the government is committed to tackling economic crime.”

The Conservative former minister John Penrose said ditching the Economic Crime Bill “will be about as popular as a cup of cold sick with anybody out there who is concerned about the fight against corruption, or the fight for transparency”.

He said: ”The well of excuses after three or four years of promising this piece of legislation, or its related pieces, has now run dry, and it is absolutely essential for the credibility of this country and of this government, particularly at a time when we have a crisis in Ukraine and all sorts of Russian oligarchs waiting to move money into this country if they possibly can."

The row began after The Times reported that documents had been quietly published on the HMRC website earlier this month showing that the Treasury expects to write off about £4.3billion of Covid loans.

However Scully told MPs this afternoon HMRC did not produce that figure, and suggested it was “an inference, I think, by journalists”.

Before that the matter was raised at PMQs, with Labour’s Kate Osamor asking Johnson did he “agree to the Chancellor writing off £4.3billion of fraud”, to which he replied: “No of course not.”

The Prime Minister's official spokesperson later insisted that Johnson was saying that he did not condone fraud, rather than that he had not agreed with Sunak.

Shortly afterwards the Chancellor sent a series of tweets addressing the fraud costs.  

"A lot of people are concerned about fraud in our Covid support measures and they're absolutely right to be," he Tweeted.

"No, I'm not ignoring it, and I'm definitely not 'writing it off'."

He outlined investment being made to tackle the issue. "The vast majority of people did the right thing but we are still addressing incorrect claims," he added.

"Last year we stopped or recovered nearly £2.2billion in potential fraud from Bounce Back Loans and £743million of overclaimed furlough grants."

PoliticsHome Newsletters

PoliticsHome provides the most comprehensive coverage of UK politics anywhere on the web, offering high quality original reporting and analysis: Subscribe

Categories

Economy
Podcast
Engineering a Better World

The Engineering a Better World podcast series from The House magazine and the IET is back for series two! New host Jonn Elledge discusses with parliamentarians and industry experts how technology and engineering can provide policy solutions to our changing world.

NEW SERIES - Listen now